Wairakiteblackhole

When caught early through routine screening, cervical cancer is curable. In the US, roughly 92% of women with early-stage cervical cancer survive five years or longer, compared with only 17% of women with late-stage cervical cancer. So recent research that shows a steep rise in new cases of advanced cervical cancer among white Southern women, and underscores the disproportionate burden of advanced cases among Black Southern women, is worrisome.

What factors might be at play, and how can people best protect themselves? Two Harvard experts share their insights.

Human papilloma virus and cervical cancer: What to know

Human papilloma virus (HPV) causes nine out of 10 cervical cancers. In 2023, 13,960 women in the US will be diagnosed with cervical cancer and 4,310 will die from it, according to American Cancer Society estimates.

Pap test screening can detect this cancer early, when it’s easiest to treat. And testing for HPV has been approved as an additional screening test for cervical cancer. It can be used alone or with a Pap test.

What did the research focus on and learn?

The study was published online in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. Researchers combed through cervical cancer data submitted to the United States Cancer Statistics program between 2001 and 2018, and national survey findings on Pap screening and HPV vaccination. During this period, nearly 30,000 women were diagnosed with late-stage cervical cancer, which has spread to other parts of the abdomen and body.

Early-stage cervical cancer cases have been dropping for most groups in the US in recent years. But advanced cervical cancer cases have not declined within any US racial, ethnic, or age group over the last 18 years.

New diagnoses of advanced disease rose 1.3% annually during the study period. Southern white women ages 40 to 44 saw an annual rise of 4.5% in advanced cases. Southern Black women ages 55 to 59 were diagnosed nearly twice as often as white women with early and advanced cases.

What else is important to understand?

The new study showed that women living in the South are less likely to be vaccinated against HPV or screened for cervical cancer. But lower screening rates likely don’t fully explain the rise in late-stage cases in that region, says Dr. Ursula Matulonis, chief of the Division of Gynecologic Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

“Most cervical cancer cases continue to be diagnosed early,” Dr. Matulonis says. “These new findings suggest that cases involving a more aggressive cell type called adenocarcinoma are also increasing. Often found higher up in the cervical canal, this is harder to detect with a Pap smear.”

Older women are especially vulnerable. Rates of late-stage cervical cancer are higher — and survival is worse — among women 65 and older than among younger women, according to a study in California. One possible reason? They may not have received the recommended number of screening tests with normal results before they stopped having Pap smears, says Dr. Sarah Feldman, a gynecologic oncologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

HPV vaccine protects against cervical cancer

The HPV vaccine is FDA-approved for use in females ages 9 through 26. The first group of vaccinated adolescents, now in their 20s, have clearly benefited: invasive cervical cancer rates among women 20 to 24 dropped by 3% each year from 1998 through 2012.

“That’s pretty impressive,” Dr. Matulonis says. “And those decreases span race and ethnicity, which isn’t always the case in women’s cancers.”

What steps can you take to protect against cervical cancer?

Dr. Feldman offers this guidance around cervical cancer prevention and detection.

• HPV vaccination. All children should be vaccinated against HPV between ages 9 and 12, well before sexual activity begins. “The most important thing for future generations in cervical cancer prevention is vaccinating that generation,” Dr. Feldman says.
• Routine screening. Regardless of vaccination status or whether they’re sexually active, women should begin having screening tests for cervical cancer in their 20s and continue through age 65. Discuss the right intervals with your doctor. Current screening guidelines take into account when you start screening and whether results of tests are normal:
  • If you start at 21: Have a Pap test every three years until 30.
  • If you start at 25: Seek an HPV test first.
  • At age 30: If all screening tests so far have been normal, have HPV testing every five years. Continue this screening until age 65.
  • Don’t stop screening at 65 unless all test results are normal, including at least two results in the last 10 years and one in the last five years.
  • If any testing led to abnormal results, you may need to continue screening beyond age 65.

An HPV infection, rather than sexual activity alone, is the factor that places people at risk, Dr. Feldman says.

“A lot of older women may have a new sexual partner in their 50s. A new HPV infection raises risk for cervical cancer roughly 20 years later,” Dr. Feldman says. “If HPV test results are persistently negative through age 65, the risk of developing cervical cancer in your 70s is low.”

About the Author

Maureen Salamon, Executive Editor, Harvard Women's Health Watch

Maureen Salamon is executive editor of Harvard Women’s Health Watch. She began her career as a newspaper reporter and later covered health and medicine for a wide variety of websites, magazines, and hospitals. Her work has … See Full Bio View all posts by Maureen Salamon

About the Reviewer

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing

Howard LeWine, M.D., is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD

When you’re low on energy, is it worth trying yerba mate, yaupon tea, matcha, and other beverages invading the coffee and tea space that promise similar energy perks and health benefits? Often marketed as wellness drinks, coffee alternatives like these are trending, according to the International Food Information Council.

So, how do a few popular alternatives stack up nutritionally? Do they rely on caffeine for an energy boost? Do they contain potentially healthy (or unhealthy) plant compounds?

The basics on coffee and tea

According to a National Coffee Association survey, 70% of American adults drink coffee, and 62% of those do so daily. Observational studies have linked compounds in coffee beans called polyphenols and antioxidants with health benefits, including a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease. Yet most of us probably don’t drink it for those reasons.

Coffee aficionados enjoy a caffeine energy boost that improves clarity and focus, and savor its fragrance and rich, deep flavor. Still, not everyone is a fan: caffeine makes some people feel jittery, and the caffeine and acidity can irritate sensitive stomachs.

Coffee’s cousin, tea, is the second most popular beverage globally behind water, and is enjoyed by a third of Americans. Most types of tea contain about half the caffeine of coffee (herbal teas have little to none) with less acidity. Tea contains health-promoting antioxidant compounds, such as flavanols.

Caffeine comparison: 8 ounces of brewed coffee contains about 95 mg caffeine; instant coffee about 60 mg; black tea about 47 mg; and green tea about 28 mg.

What to know about yerba mate

Yerba mate (or mate) is an herbal tea from the Ilex paraguariensis tree in South America that has an earthy and more bitter flavor than other teas. It contains antioxidant polyphenols like chlorogenic acid, plus as much caffeine as coffee or more (80 to 175 mg per cup). Preliminary research suggests it might promote weight loss and lower blood cholesterol, but studies are inconclusive. Users report less fatigue and better focus — likely from its caffeine content — but without jitteriness.

Downside: Certain processing methods of mate, such as drying the leaves with smoke, may introduce polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons — the same carcinogenic substances that are found in grilled meats. Some research links drinking large amounts of mate over time with increased risk of certain cancers, including head and neck, stomach, bladder, and lung. However, unsmoked mate (which is processed by air drying) may be safer.

What to know about yaupon tea

Like mate, yaupon is an herbal tea. Native to the US, it has a mellow grassy flavor similar to green tea. It contains chlorogenic acid and antioxidants that are purported to decrease inflammation and boost energy. This tea has 60 mg caffeine per cup and also provides theobromine, a compound structurally similar to caffeine found in cocoa beans and many teas. Theobromine increases blood flow and may increase energy and alertness, but this boost is slower to start and lasts longer than caffeine, which provides a quick but short-lived boost.

Downside: The combination of theobromine and caffeine may increase heart rate and interfere with sleep, especially if you drink a large amount of yaupon or sip it too close to bedtime.

What to know about matcha tea

Matcha comes from the same Camellia sinensis plant as green tea. However, unlike green tea, matcha is grown in the shade, which protects it from sunlight and oxidation and contributes to its bright green color and higher polyphenol content. Whole tea leaves and stems of matcha are ground into a fine powder, which is then whisked with hot water or milk. Matcha contains about 40 to 175 mg caffeine per cup and has the same antioxidant polyphenols as green tea, specifically theanine and catechins. However, because whole leaves are used to make matcha, it may contain higher concentrations than standard green tea.

Downside: While green tea has low to moderate amounts of caffeine, matcha can have very high amounts, even more than coffee.

What to know about chicory coffee

Chicory is the root of the Chicorium Intybus plant that is dried, roasted, and ground to produce a beverage. Chicory contains prebiotic fiber called inulin that caramelizes during roasting, giving the drink a dark brown color with a nutty, sweeter, and less bitter flavor than traditional coffee. It tastes similar to regular coffee but does not offer the same energy boost, as it is caffeine-free. (Some people mix chicory coffee with brewed coffee for a lower-caffeine drink.) Animal studies show that chicory root has anti-inflammatory properties. Inulin may benefit the gut microbiome and bowel health, but the small amounts found in chicory coffee are not likely to provide such a benefit.

Downside: The chicory plant comes from the same family as ragweed, so chicory coffee may cause allergic reactions in people sensitive to ragweed pollen.

The bottom line

Coffee-alternative wellness drinks may contain similar plant compounds to those found in regular coffee and green or black tea. It’s fine to choose them if you like the taste. Just don’t assume that they’re healthier, because no strong evidence supports claims of weight loss, heart health, or cancer prevention.

These beverages are best enjoyed plain or with only a touch of lemon, honey, unsweetened milk, or plant milk. Processing and added ingredients can negate any health-promoting effects from naturally-occurring plant compounds. For example, some research suggests that adding protein and fat to tea through milk or creamer can reduce antioxidant properties and might deactivate flavonoids. And even if natural compounds remain intact, saturating a beverage with sugar, half-and-half, syrups, or whipped cream transforms it into a dessert, neutralizing any potential health perks.

About the Author

Nancy Oliveira, MS, RD, LDN, CDCES,

Contributor

Nancy Oliveira is manager of the nutrition and wellness service at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. In addition, she is the primary science writer at The Nutrition Source website from the Harvard T.H. Chan School … See Full Bio View all posts by Nancy Oliveira, MS, RD, LDN, CDCES

Feeling rooted in community and socializing with neighbors may strongly contribute to better cardiovascular health by improving diet, exercise habits, and weight control, new research among Black adults in Georgia suggests. And better cardiovascular health may add up to fewer heart attacks and strokes, two leading causes of disability and death.

“There’s a range of interactions within the community that can improve one’s cardiovascular health, not to mention the effect on mental health — the sense of belonging, of being seen — which is tightly related to cardiovascular outcomes in the long run,” says Dr. Dhruv Kazi, director of the cardiac critical care unit at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) and associate director of the Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology.

“Another way to put it is that these unique sources of resilience in communities may directly affect diet, exercise, weight, and mental well-being, all of which lead to improved cardiovascular health,” he adds.

A positive perspective on health within Black communities

The new analysis is part of the ongoing Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular Center for Health Equity (MECA) study in Atlanta. MECA builds on prior research indicating that living in disadvantaged areas is associated with higher rates of having heart disease or dying from it. But unlike much of that research — which focused on negative aspects of Black neighborhoods that may contribute to poor cardiovascular health — the new study fills a gap. It zeroes in on positive neighborhood features, especially social interactions, that can promote ideal cardiovascular health despite higher risks related to race or socioeconomic status.

“Typically, researchers are identifying factors that result in health disparities on the negative side, such as deaths or co-existing diseases, or that cause increased rates of a particular disease,” explains Dr. Fidencio Saldana, dean for students at Harvard Medical School and an attending physician in medicine and cardiology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH), whose research interests include racial disparities and outcomes in cardiovascular disease. “It’s quite unique to be able to look for solutions, or to look at these positive attributes of communities and think about how to replicate them.”

Measuring social environment and heart health

The study included 392 Black men and women between the ages of 30 and 70 living in the Atlanta area. None had existing cardiovascular disease. About four in 10 participants were men.

Social environment includes perceptions of neighbors and any support system, as well as how often neighbors interact. Participants answered questions about seven neighborhood features: aesthetics, walking environment, availability of healthy foods, safety, social cohesion, activity with neighbors, and violence.

Heart health was measured using Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) scores, developed by the American Heart Association to determine ideal cardiovascular health. LS7 calculates seven elements that influence cardiovascular health: self-reported exercise, diet, and smoking history, as well as measured blood pressure, sugar level, cholesterol level, and body mass index (BMI). Researchers also gathered information about annual income, education, and marital and employment status, and physical exams that included blood tests.

What did the researchers learn?

After controlling for factors that could skew results, researchers found participants who reported more social connection and activity with neighbors were about twice as likely to record ideal LS7 scores. The association was even stronger among Black women than men.

“Our health is more closely related to these social networks than we appreciate,” Dr. Kazi says, noting that individual efforts to combat obesity and smoking, for instance, are more likely to gain steam “when shared by neighbors.”

“The more we’re able to engage with our neighbors and the communities we live in, the better it probably is for our cardiovascular health,” he says.

The study was observational, so it cannot prove cause and effect. It’s also possible that those who are already healthier are more likely to engage with their neighbors, Dr. Kazi notes. Other limitations are the location of all participants in a single metropolitan area, and the self-reported nature of neighborhood characteristics. Another key area that went unexamined, Dr. Kazi says, involves a “missing piece” in LS7 scores: mental health.

“Living in a community where you feel safe and know your neighbors — where you feel part of the social fabric — is critically important to mental health, and therefore cardiovascular health,” he explains. “If anything, this study underestimates the health benefits of feeling part of a cohesive neighborhood.”

What are a few takeaways from this study?

Social environment and feeling rooted within a community matter to health, and may even help counter negative risk factors. However, long-term lack of investment and the effects of gentrification threaten many Black neighborhoods in cities throughout the US.

“When a neighborhood gets gentrified and longstanding residents are forced to leave, the community is gone forever,” Dr. Kazi adds. “Simply offering the departing residents housing elsewhere doesn’t make up for what is lost. Going forward, we need to be cognizant of the value of community, and invest in our neighborhoods that allow people to safely engage in physical and community activities.”

Dr. Saldana agrees. “Our system is not set up for some communities to have those advantages. It’s important to look to the positive aspects of our communities, and as a system encourage those positive traits in other communities.”

About the Author

Maureen Salamon, Executive Editor, Harvard Women's Health Watch

Maureen Salamon is executive editor of Harvard Women’s Health Watch. She began her career as a newspaper reporter and later covered health and medicine for a wide variety of websites, magazines, and hospitals. Her work has … See Full Bio View all posts by Maureen Salamon

Many people and their families associate the term palliative care with the end of life. Some may think that palliative care and hospice care are one and the same. So it’s worth explaining that palliative care is a medical specialty able to help people during many different stages of health, not just during a terminal illness. Importantly, the services offered could help you or someone you love enjoy a better quality of life, ease uncomfortable symptoms, and avoid unnecessary hospitalizations.

Asmedical oncologists (cancer doctors), we’ve witnessed how helpful this care can be when people experience cancer or another serious illness. Yet we find that not enough people who could benefit from this care receive it. By addressing misconceptions about what palliative care is and who it can help, we hope more people will ask for the full range of care they deserve, and inquire about whether a referral to palliative care is right for them.

What is palliative care?

Palliative care looks holistically at ways to improve quality of life for people and caregivers by

• helping people manage pain, nausea, fatigue, and other troubling symptoms associated with illness or treatment, to optimize their comfort and ability to function
• providing support for depression, anxiety, or stressors such as finances or relationships that may be affected by a serious illness
• improving care coordination by communicating with other health care providers to make sure everyone is on the same page regarding needs and preferences
• if appropriate, explaining and providing options for end-of-life care (this form of palliative care is part of hospice care).

In many health care settings, palliative care is handled by one or a few health care providers, such as a physician, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner. In others, palliative care may be provided by a team of clinicians and social workers, spiritual counselors, and case managers.

People sometimes think of palliative care as a last resort; you might have heard this, or even thought this way yourself. It may help to know that the type of care we’re describing is now recognized as essential to treatment, even during the early stages of serious illnesses like cancer, emphysema, heart failure, and kidney disease. People can and should receive palliative care while also receiving curative or life-prolonging treatments.

Who can palliative care help?

Palliative care can help any person experiencing a serious medical problem causing physical or emotional distress.

Typically, this refers to people with life-threatening or chronic illnesses such as cancer, heart disease, lung disease, neurologic impairment, or kidney failure. It can also refer to people who have experienced an injury resulting in physical ailments, emotional distress, or both. So in a sense, these services can be offered to anyone based on their symptoms rather than their specific diagnosis. Palliative care services are also available to support families and caregivers.

Why is my doctor talking to me about palliative care?

You might feel alarmed if your doctor recommends palliative care. However, it’s important to understand that the benefits of palliative care are greatest when introduced early after a new diagnosis of a serious illness, pain syndrome, or physical trauma. In our practice, we tend to explain the concept of palliative care soon after a cancer diagnosis for people who may benefit from additional support.

Our goal is to offer information on the resources available to support well-being, not to take away hope or scare people. The better you feel, the better you’ll do. Experiencing less pain, nausea, fatigue, or depression makes medical treatments and surgeries easier to tolerate, which may expand both quality and quantity of life.

We’ve answered frequently asked questions below.

Why is my doctor talking about palliative care?

To enhance support for people experiencing tough times and serious illnesses, not when “there’s nothing left to do.”

Am I dying?

A referral to palliative care does not mean that you are dying — it just means that you and your family may need more support to help you live as long and as well as possible.

Are you still my doctor?

Yes! Palliative care providers are consultants who team up with your doctors, including your primary care doctor and other specialists involved in your care.

If I have a question, who do I call?

If your question is related to a symptom or medicine managed by your palliative care team, then it is appropriate to reach out to them. However, you can never go wrong by calling the primary doctor directing your care, such as your oncologist if you have cancer. They can field your question and send you to the right person.

What medicines will be available to me?

Any medicines to help you feel better or live longer, including cancer treatments, are available if deemed helpful by you and your doctors.

Do I have to continue seeing my palliative care provider or team?

Just like any other doctor, they are available if you find you benefit from their services. If you no longer feel that you have needs that they can address, then you do not have to continue receiving their care.

Will my family benefit from palliative care?

Yes, definitely! One of the main goals of palliative care is to improve quality of life for people and their families or caregivers through counseling, information, and helping to coordinate doctor visits and medical tests.

About the Authors

Emily Stern Gatof, MD, Guest Contributor

Dr. Emily Stern Gatof is a hematology/oncology fellow at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC). She is pursuing a career as a breast oncologist and has a special interest in hereditary cancer syndromes. After attending the … See Full Bio View all posts by Emily Stern Gatof, MD

David J. Einstein, MD, Contributor

Dr. David J. Einstein is a genitourinary medical oncologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. In addition to patient care, he leads clinical/translational research in immunotherapy … See Full Bio View all posts by David J. Einstein, MD